Skip to main content

Public v Private - The argumental epitome of the Irish psyche

I read an article in todays Journal by a recruitment consultant based in Wicklow. The article makes the point for the need for change in the public service. In my opinion some of the article is absolute nonsense whilst other parts of it are extremely sensible. But in this case, the article itself is inconsequential. It is the peoples reaction to the article and the wider argument is what interests me in this instance.

Why are we, a modern, advanced and intelligent society, constantly bound to defending the indefensible, whilst attacking what we don't understand. I am not washing my own hands of this trait, far from it in fact, I am probably the worst offender. I often criticise the Public service, banks, politicians and the media for what I believe are their wrong doings, especially now, more than before our current set of difficulties. But is this fair ? Do I know enough about the bodies I complain about? My information comes from two main sources, the first being the more responsible media sources and the second being friends and family that either work within the respective body or sector or have knowledge of what goes on inside those bodies or sectors.

Nevertheless, Ireland now resembles a boxing ring. The Public sector, backed by the left wing parties and the unions in one corner versus the Private sector backed by the centre and right of centre parties in the other. Since 2008 we have all stood by and watched round after round of sneaky uppercuts and dodgy body blows, of the argumentative type, with neither fighter coming out with a real knockout blow.

What the last four years have thought me however, is that the majority of us all want the same thing. I don't buy into the argument from certain sections of society that it's the governments fault, that they are somehow putting something into the water to ensure we all fight amongst ourselves. What I do believe though is that, the vast majority on both sides engage in the fight with the best of intentions, believing in their cause, or fighter, if you will. However, the fight is pitched all wrong. Whilst both contestants tire each other out, engaging in round after round, we are all missing the point, due to arrogance, intolerance or perhaps a flaw of the Irish psyche.

What the majority on both sides want is a fair, just, safe and healthy society for us all to live in. However, we are too unwilling to listen to the other side to find a resolution. Now, I am not for a second proposing some ludicrous and corrupt fallacy like Social Partnership, in fact, in my opinion, the unions, as they exist today, have absolutely no interest in the greater good or the effective delivery of public services, the Croke Park Agreement being testament to that fact. But whilst I don't believe in the motives of the unions, I have great faith in the vast majority of the public service. Yes, I often do my very best to highlight the wrong doing and what I believe to be the major flaws within them, but surely weeding out the quangos and inefficiency is for the benefit of the grafters and good public servants. However, this message never gets the opportunity to be conveyed to the public service, as inevitably the "voice of the worker", a union rep or top civil servant on a six figure salary steps in, to protect their interest and selfish motive. I have no doubt either that the same exists in the other direction. No doubt some business lobbyist or capitalist nut is too quick to criticise, and, unwilling to listen so to protect their own interest. 

So today, following my reading of that article I wish that the influence of the well paid lobbyists on both sides could be drowned out by those of us just looking for some equality and fairness in this new Ireland of ours. When I request change in the public service, I wish every public servant wouldn't jump on my case, and recognise that in fact it is for the benefit and greater rewarding of the good public servants that I want this change, as well as of course a greater, better working public service for all our people. However, I am sad to reflect on what I believe to be the reality. As a society we are a knee-jerk people, a people too unwilling to listen and compromise for the greater good, a society epitomised by the current battle between our two great fighters, two fighters in fact, that come from the same corner, wear the same colours with coaches who have equally selfish motives, battling each other for no prize, but for the supposed pleasure of injuring the other fighter more. It's very sad when you really think about it...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Reflection on the Referendum

Since 2012 I have lived with M.E, an illness that is both deeply complex and largely misunderstood in equal amounts. While the trajectory of my journey of recovery has generally been on an upward curve, and for the past number of years I have found myself living as close to a normal life as could be expected, the past number of weeks I have hit a large impasse. I haven’t feared for my future this much in a long time, as I prepare for more hospital visits, journeys that I forgot filled me with such trepidation.

So what has all this got to do with the 8th amendment referendum I hear you ask? Today has been a tough day mentally, as I struggle to get to grips with the abject disappointment of my current health, and the impact this is having on my life today. As I spent much of this morning in silence, I began thinking about the issue of so called 'hard cases' that have been mentioned ad nauseam by both sides in the current debate. I have no doubt that I would not be considered a &#…

Children, and the 8th amendment debate

The eight amendment debate has been vitriolic, and thus far raw emotion, intolerance, hysterical claims, and a lack of insight into opposing views have formed the entire premise on which to argue ones ‘cause’. Just a number of weeks ago, as I walked down Patrick Street in Cork, I observed a ‘prolife’ lobby group displaying the now all too familiar gruesome imagery, that their propaganda machine deems appropriate to exhibit. It was a Saturday afternoon, at prime time trading hours, on one of the busiest thoroughfares in Cork; their position ensured they had the capacity to engage a critical mass of families. Somewhat astonishingly, the group’s obliviousness to the damage such imagery could have on a child’s emotional well being only became apparent to me when I pointed out this fact directly to them. They weren’t for turning. Unfortunately, the ironic disregard for children’s well being in this current debate is nothing new. In the past week, I have observed children holding placards a…

'The Irish Social Worker' - The Children and Family Relationships Act 2015, a critique.

While Ireland still grapples with a litany of historical failures in respect of children; professionals, policy makers, and legislators have recognised the need for policy and law that concerns children to be in a consistent state of evolution. This is recognised as crucial to account for evolving societal norms, growing research with respect to childhood experiences, as well as the archaic nature of much of Irish legislation and policy. Consequently, it could be interpreted that any policy or legislative shift is conducive to Ireland making positive strides in enhancing the rights of children, advocating for positive childhood experiences, as well as developing policy and legislation that is more in line with the contemporary realities of Irish families, where children are born to non-married parents much more frequently. Notwithstanding this however, it is crucial that we are cognisant of the need to remain objective when examining any and all perceived ‘advancements’ in policy and …